Europeans are being forced into an energy transition through debt-fueled spending that will lead to permanently higher energy prices and stifle European competitiveness.
Reflections on the modern world from a libertarian point of view, covering politics, philosophy, international relations, foreign policy and culture. I am publishing more frequently now on my Substack blog : finnandreen.substack.com
After the overview intro to this series, it’s time to dig
deeper into Europe’s eclipse of intelligence. The notion of lack of intelligence
highlights that the decline of Europe is not inevitable or natural, but on the
contrary, could have been avoided - and can be remedied - through the
application of intelligence broadly defined.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn used the term “Eclipse of Intelligence” in order to describe Europe’s loss of values amidst what he saw as an ever-growing soulless materialism. Though in hindsight it seems like a somewhat exaggerated criticism of Europe of the time, the Russian author’s formula seems particularly apt today, considering the continent’s seeming death wish.
The recently FoIA released Bush-Putin verbatim transcripts provide interesting insights into US-Russia relations during the presidency of George W. Bush. Considering the on-going tragedy in Ukraine, the details of the meeting between Bush and Putin in Sochi, Russia on April 6, 2008 is of particular historical interest.
Many pundits are talking about a split between the United States and Europe, a sort of falling out among thieves, as it were. It may look that way superficially, but is it so? Of course, geography and History will never align the two in terms of strategy and outlook, so the commonality of views are always to some extent imposed and superficial. Nevertheless, the combination of the Five Eyes Anglo-Saxon countries with continental Europe is referred to as the “Collective West” for a reason. In particular in Europe, the US has been involved as peace-maker and political stabilizer since 1945, though sometimes by subterfuge and far from peaceful means.
A strong argument against modern ethics of natural rights is the skepticism these often elicit, even among libertarians. If one of these doctrines actually were unassailable, then it presumably would receive overwhelming support in the libertarian community, if not more widely.
A critical review of the normative
arguments and the empirical evidence for natural rights seems relevant,
therefore, and could lead to a more nuanced and less principled approach. The
common modern definition of “natural rights” is used in this context, namely
the universal right to self-ownership, homesteading, and private property.
As a year of tragic events and fraught international relations comes to a close, it’s time to look back on 2025 and prepare for 2026. Our world is in the midst of radical upheaval, the significance of which we generally can only fully grasp in retrospect. Antonio Gramsci’s often quoted sentence seems more apt than ever: “The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters.”
Indeed, let us expose again these monsters, one by one. First, it must be admitted that these monstrous entities are mostly Western, with an enormous propensity for lying.
When the latest US National Security Strategy document came out, many analysts in Europe saw this as a confirmation that the US under the Trump administration is concerned about Europe, wants to support Europe, and selfishly wants Europe to succeed. Regardless of whether this NSS will represent US foreign policy and whether this NSS will actually be implemented, both of which are far for certain, this view of Washington from Europe must be cynically and clearly debunked.
God knows Trump is flawed. When Putin was asked in 2024 whether he preferred Biden or Trump, he answered Biden for his predictability. Putin doesn’t understand unpredictable narcissists like Trump; who does? This partly explains some of Putin’s missteps in recent months with respect to Trump and the high-stakes diplomatic game going on between the two superpowers.
But the mistakes go back further in time and are not only related to Trump, but concern Putin’s relationship with the West generally. This is surprising since the Russian president comes across as a balanced, objective and historically-minded thinker; arguably the only real statesman worthy of the name in current times.
Set in colonial Spanish Los Angeles
around 1820, the movie takes viewers back to a conservative and traditional society,
very different from L.A. today. Yet, like the original novel
from 1919, it explores timeless themes: identity and deception, the inspiring
force of heroism, the tension between individual will and societal
expectations, and to top it off; justice and political struggle. One reviewer put it well: “The Mark of Zorro emphasizes the significance of fighting
against injustice and standing up for what is right, even if it means taking
risks and going against societal norms.”
The ascent to power in Argentina of an avowed
libertarian, in
the person of Javier Milei, was seen not only with excitement by many
libertarians but also as a moment of truth. Not only did it show that it was possible
to get a majority of the electorate of a large country to vote for a radical
agenda of freedom, but it also suggested that libertarians might finally be
able to show the entire world that the unhampered free market is not only
possible, but also highly beneficial for society.